The goal of this tax, as stated by
the advocates pushing it, is to promote the health of those living in Multnomah
County by stopping consumption of sugary drinks. Over consumption of sugary
drinks can lead to diabetes and obesity and this tax seeks to curb the increase
in those maladies. According to Oregonlive, former New York City Mayor Michael
Bloomberg provided $60,000 to get the initiative started. In cities where this
sort of tax has been introduced they have seen a 20% decrease in soda
consumption.
Yet what they do not report is the
loss of jobs and damages to small businesses. Distributors will be laid off or
fired, small businesses will take a hit to already dwindling profit margins,
and consumers will be forced to pay the tax to get what they want or go
without. Soda is not a necessary item but it is something that people want. We
already have taxes on cigarettes, alcohol, and lottery games and now they are
coming for your soda.
Yes those things are unhealthy for you, but why should we allow the
government to use its authority to tax us as a way to tell us what we can and
cannot consume? The responsibility of that choice falls on the individual not
the state. Another argument for the tax is the claim that people who get
diabetes from over consumption of soda and can’t afford the medical care is a burden
on the state. That just seems like an argument against state funded healthcare
to me. Ultimately it comes down to choice, do we the people have the choice in
how we want to live our lives, or do advocacy groups and government officials
get to make those choices for us? Does the free market get to decide the price
of what is sold or does the government? In 1773 the Sons of Liberty dumped a
shipment of tea into the harbor over a tax dispute. Will you stand by and allow
this blatant reach into your pocket and attempt to control your actions, or
could we see a Portland Soda Party? Only time will tell.
No comments:
Post a Comment