Antifa Shut Down Rose Festival Parade

            The rose parade on 82^nd Ave in Portland Oregon was cancelled due to violent threats made by an ‘anonymous’ person. The threats said that if the organizers allowed the Multnomah GOP to march in the parade they would send 100’s of people in to “push and drag” them out. It is understandable that the organizers, after appealing to the police for more protection and were told they did not have the manpower, would cancel the parade because they did not want the families enjoying the parade to get hurt.

            The people behind these acts are the same people who were behind the anti-Trump riots in Portland after the election. Two groups, Direct Action Alliance and Oregon Students Empowerment are the ones organizing the protests against the parade though they claim to know nothing of the threatening email. Direct Action Alliance told the Washington Post “no Portland child will see a march in support of this fascist regime go unopposed.” If you go to the Facebook pages of both groups you’ll see the backlash they have received. A group of people, outraged that the event was shut down, are holding a free speech rally and walk along the parade route. Direct Action Alliance and Oregon Students Empowerment both plan on showing up to shut down the rally.

            It would seem Portland is headed for a standoff like the one seen in Berkeley California. If the police won’t protect the rights of the people and the public officials refuse to do anything then the people will take things into their own hands. Hopefully the rally will be peaceful and show these Antifa groups they will not be tolerated. Only time will tell.

Personal Responsibility

            You hear online and on TV about rights. Gay rights, Trans-rights, bathroom rights, immigrant rights, and the list goes on and on. Yet with all this talk about rights, no one is talking about responsibility. It would seem that society has moved away from personal responsibility and toward the idea that everything you want is a right. Responsibility can mean a lot of work but with that work comes a sense of meaning. It gives your life a purpose. In taking on this responsibility helps relieve some of the suffering that is life so that it not only makes your life better but the life of those around you.

            It seems lately that our society has moved away from responsibility and toward rights. With this move people have increasingly been calling for government to not only guarantee those rights but to provide them as well. You can hear people say things like ‘everyone has a right to housing and because there are people without homes the government needs to pay for them to have housing.’ Yet no one is talking about personal responsibility. They never ask the question, why does that person not have housing or do they even want housing?

            Instead they go and fight for the homeless person as if they are a child that needs someone to talk for them. It would seem this focus on rights just seeks to take care of everyone’s suffering. To some degree I respect that goal but it also takes away someone’s freedom when you do everything for them. Responsibility on the other hand gives you a sense of purpose. Among millennials (of which I am a member, just barely) you’ll have notice #adulting being used. It is often used when someone spends time paying bills or buys a house or generally takes care of some responsibility. When you do those tasks it give your life meaning. It is important to have responsibility because it is through responsibility that we not only give meaning to our life but we reduce suffering in life. If you take enough responsibility you can even help reduce suffering in the life of those around you.

            An example of responsibility reducing suffering would be if you have the responsibility of owning a house. Being able to take on that responsibility means you have a spare room for your friend when they go through a break up or need a place to stay. The more you are able to take on the better off you’ll be and the better off those around you will be. This idea manifests itself to me on a daily bases. My wife runs a dog rescue and the added responsibility in our lives has made it so that we were able to help a friend when her dog got sick. It all turned out well, but if we had never taken on the responsibility of the rescue and our friend had not taken on the responsibility of volunteering for the rescue we would never have met. We would not have been able to help or even known what to do to help.

            Life is suffering, we all suffer in life one way or another. It is through responsibility that we can relieve suffering in our own life and in the lives of those around us. We need to stop demanding that our government or someone else give us stuff (rights) and start taking the responsibility of getting what we want ourselves. In doing so you’ll give your life meaning and help bring meaning to other people’s lives. With this meaning it helps make all the suffering in life worth it as well as help reduce the suffering we all face on a daily bases. The more responsibility you are able to take on the more suffering you can help reduce in others as well. So pick up that burden of responsibility and stumble forward with it, give your life meaning, and help make life a bit better, not only for yourself but for those around you too.

Something I Learned

            I have been thinking a lot about free speech and speaking up. I looked at myself and wondered why I don’t speak up more often when I disagree with something. I examined the feelings I had when I was in a situation where I wanted to say something but did not. I found that the reason I did not speak up was because I did not want to rock the boat. That is to say I did not want to start an argument with someone. Once I realized that, I had to ask why I didn’t want to start an argument with someone. The answer to this question was because I thought that they would bring up a topic that I did not know about and would defeat my argument. So I resolved myself to learn about as much as I could. The more I learned the more I realized that I could not know everything. I realized that if I spent all my time trying to make sure I knew everything before I spoke I would not speak.

            It was around this time that I started listening to F.A. Hayek (it actually started with a fictional rap battle between Hayek and Keynes on YouTube) and Thomas Sowell. I downloaded and listened to Thomas Sowell’s book Intellectuals and Society. A book I highly recommend if you want a look at how intellectual shape society and form their ways of thinking. This is where I came across the idea that had already formed in my mind but I had not found the words to express it. The idea that one person, no matter how intelligent, charismatic or insightful they may be can never know more than society. The collective knowledge of individuals will always be more than the knowledge of one person.

            An example of this would be a college professor. They may be an expert in whatever field they teach (let’s say Gender Studies) and they may be very educated but they know next to nothing when it comes to economics. So why is it that we think educated people (people with a degree) know more than everyone else? The truth is that they do know more than the average person, in one specific field. Yet you see over and over again a Professor held up as someone who can comment on anything and be seen as a creditable and valid source. This is the problem with central planning and top down regulation. One person cannot know more than the collective knowledge of everyone and one solution cannot fix the problems of everyone. This is why people need to be free to find solutions for themselves.

Would you rather have the Government say what is and is not a good Engineer or would you rather have Engineers and the people they are working for make those choices? Would you rather have the intelligent professor of Gender Studies fix your car or a Mechanic? Everyone is an individual with their own dreams and desires, their own problems and faults and the best methods of obtaining their dreams and desires and overcoming their problems and faults is going to be different for each individual. This is why individual freedom will always produce far better results in the long run than any sort of central planning or one size fits all solution.

The Victory of Berkeley

This weekend we had another battle over free speech at Berkeley. It started as a free speech rally with people from all different political stripes. Classical liberals, Conservatives, Libertarians, and more attended the event to hear the speakers. Before the main event could happen Antifa showed up. They knocked down the barricade and started throwing things into the crowd gathered in an attempt to shut the event down. They came demanding the event to be stopped and if it was not they were more than willing to use violence to shut it down. This worked before at Berkeley against Milo Yiannopoulos and during the March 4 Trump rally.

This time the free speech people came ready to fight too. The crowds clashed, some fights were started by Antifa and some by the free speech group. The police stood back and let it all happen. When asked why they let this happen they said “That’s a good question for the chief of police.” And “I would refer you to our information officer for a statement.” As the police were watching the crowds started to fight more. Antifa pulled people from the free speech crowd, surrounded them and started stomping on them and beating them. They also threw fireworks and M80’s in to the free speech crowd. The explosions were caused by Antifa, not the police. They also attacked their mortal enemy the trash can (Antifa hate trash cans for some reason). The turn in the battle came when Antifa threw a smoke bomb with the wind blowing back at them. The smoke blew over the Antifa group and Antifa broke ranks and ran.

The free speech crowd, realizing the enemy was fleeing rushed them, turning the retreat into a rout. Now it was time for Antifa to get beat in the street. Antifa was pushed from the street and fled. They lost this battle of Berkeley but with this loss they will come back harder. Next time we may see more than just fist fights and people with sticks and fireworks. The next step is organizing and increasing your arms. Antifa message boards are already talking about what the next step is so they do not lose the next battle. They noticed the free speech people were wearing helmets that could absorb some damage and the person could keep fighting.

The people in Antifa are a serious problem. They are fully committed to the cause and believe they are righteous. This righteousness allows them to justify any action they take as long as it furthers the cause. They believe this is a revolution and they need to fight the ‘fascists’ who are in power. These people are violent and militant and should not be underestimated. They want to destroy the whole society and bring about communism, all in the name of equality. They are out of control and the people in power are refusing to do anything about it.

This will lead to people to take action into their own hands. We saw it at the free speech rally where the crowd fought back against Antifa. In the crowd were people who consider themselves white nationalist. They are the far right version of identity politics of the far left. These people are to be rejected as well. I know the old axiom of the enemy of my enemy is my friend but in this case the white nationalists are more of a liability than a benefit. The white nationalist movement has grown in response to movements such as Black Lives Matter and the ideas permeating from universities that white males are the reason society has so many troubles. It seems they believe that if blacks and Latino’s can have their own groups and organizations than why can’t white people. In fact they take it a step farther and say white people are going to be destroyed if they don’t have their own advocacy organizations.

I bring up the white nationalist because they are appealing to more and more people the more Antifa is allowed to get away with violence. In times of trouble people will look to someone, anyone, with a solution. We have to ask ourselves, do we want people going to white nationalism for that solution or just giving in to Antifa for their solution? The answer is no. The only way to stop this is to have regular people stand up and take charge. The speakers at the free speech rally denounced the white nationalists along with Antifa and this is what we need to do. We need to reject both extremes and get the majority of people to find the middle way.

This time free speech won the day in Berkeley but Antifa is far from destroyed. They will be back and will escalate things. The white nationalist will welcome this to boost their numbers. We the people need to put a stop to this, hold our freely elected leaders accountable and if they refuse to put a stop to it, than we the average people will need to stand up and put a stop to it ourselves. If that happens, I’ll be ready to stand, would you stand with me?

The Age of Woke Children

Many people who go online today will see a video, tweet, or meme depicting a child saying something profound. Imagine the show Kids say the Darnist Things but instead of comedy it’s political. We saw this in the wake of Trumps election when several leftist posted to twitter quotes allegedly spoken by their children, who all happened to be around 8 years old. We also got videos of kids looking directly into the camera and saying things like they are afraid of Trump or trying to give him advice (like, “maybe you should sit in a quiet place and think about things before you make a decision.”). There are two main reasons I can think that this would be done. Protect the children narrative and even a child knows narrative.

            The protect the children narrative is used to get people to hate Trump because he is a threat to their children. If your child comes to you and says I’m afraid of that person over there, as a parent your natural instinct is to protect your child. You immediately do not like the person they indicated and are on guard from them. While this is not always true (and most parents would follow up with their child and reassure them everything is fine), it is a natural instinct to protect your children. It also gives the idea to children that Trump is something to be feared. They hear their friends saying it (and probably their teachers) and they start to think it is real. When your child has a real fear of something parents will do lots to comfort their kids. Leave the hall light on all night, check under the bed for monsters and much more are done, even though the parents know the fears are unfounded. The lengths a parent will go to for their children are limitless and if your kid is afraid of Trump than it makes you think, is he really as awful a person as the media and Regressive’s make him out to be?

            The second narrative is the even a child knows narrative. This is used as a way of showing how amazing some Regressive’s child is as well as a way of making people feel stupid or wrong. Out of the mouth of babes is a famous axiom uttered when a child can see and say something clearly because of their youthful innocence. Regressive parents love tweeting ‘amazing’ and ‘intelligent’ things their children say. They want to say look at how ‘smart’ my kid is, they are so smart because I am a great parent, I am awesome. In reality the child is just parroting what the parents (or their teachers) are saying. The left seem to think that repeating what you hear over and over again is a sign of intelligence (just look at their protesters, activists and college students). This is also used to say you are stupid, even a child knows this person is evil, why can’t you? They try to get you to think, well maybe I missed something, and maybe I was wrong.

            These narratives seem silly when you recognize them, yet they both seem to work. This is largely due to the fact that people will listen to what a child has to say in a short video titled “Most amazing 8 year old ever!!!!!!!!!!!! You’ll never believe it”. We cannot make choices about Government and policy based on what our children say. Children do not know anything nor can they provide deep insight into anything past what kind of candy they like. Do not be manipulated by people who are using children to pull on your heart strings and emotions. Just think, would I let a child make the rules and financial choices for my home? Children should be loved and cherished, given structure and rules. They should not give rules and should not make important decisions. The people that would use children in this way should be outed for what they really are, manipulators and ideologues bent on changing you to validate their own twisted world view. Remember, be wary of woke 8 year olds, they may be funny in an online video but usually have someone pulling their strings to try and pull yours.

Why do these people stay together?

Feminism and Islam go together like an abusive husband and a woman who will blame everyone else for her abuse. The only reason they stay together is because Feminism is pregnant with a totalitarian ideology and Islam might be the father. Although Marxism was at Feminism’s house a lot so he could be the father. Feminism is a slut, she even told me so. But who am I to judge, if Feminism and Islam want to have an open relationship with Marxism, who am I to say that is wrong. Black Lives Matter has been hanging out with Feminism too, I guess she is a slut. Again, no judgement. I remember they all got together one time for a parade or something one time, it was peaceful, but very awkward. I was sure Marxism and Islam did not get along but they seemed to patch things up. Islam and Black Lives Matters on the other hand have been old friends. It is a strange group of people who live in the Post-Modern house on the corner of Demo Street and Crat Lane. I usually try to avoid them, I mean I’ve heard them say some pretty racist stuff before. Feminism does have her friend LBGTQ over sometimes but they were calling her something else. She changes her name a lot it is hard to keep up. I think Marxism likes LBGTQ but I know Islam hates her. One time I overheard Islam threatening to throw LBGTQ off the roof. Black Lives Matter and LBGTQ have a love hate relationships. They got into a fight while on a walk awhile back. LBGTQ wanted to have a party but Black Lives Matter said they needed to be more serious. Antifa is a wild cousin, anytime he comes over I make sure to lock the door. He has gotten into a lot of fights and anything will set him off, especially free speech. I don’t mean to gossip but I just thought that you needed to know. Strange bedfellow if you ask me.

Beware Protesters

In this country we have seen protesters take to the street in frustration. It may have started with legitimate causes and for a good reason but was quickly taken over by a malicious group of people who want to get away with destruction of property and violence. The media forgives them for this violence and excuses it away and they are backed up by politicians and universities. Currently we have no solution to the problem. I thought, okay we let them throw a fit and when they realize that’s not working they will stop and then we can talk about it. Instead something very different has happened. They have not stopped throwing a fit, instead they have doubled down on their tantrum. This is because they have an ideology that tells them they are under attack and this is the only way to defend yourself. They have professors and politicians agreeing with them and telling them that they need to protect themselves from is microaggressions. Let’s look at the word microaggression for a moment.

 

The definition is “Microaggressions are the everyday verbal, nonverbal, and environmental slights, snubs, or insults, whether intentional or unintentional, which communicate hostile, derogatory, or negative messages to target persons based solely upon their marginalized group membership.”

 

So it is a small hostile or violent behavior. If someone is hostile or violent toward someone else then it is okay to defend yourself. This is something that I would agree with, if you are being attacked it is acceptable and expected to fight back. But the dangerous part of microaggressions is that it puts it on the person being microaggressed. This means that if someone FEELS like they are being slighted or insulted, regardless of evidence or proof or actually being insulted, then they are experiencing an aggressive act against them. Remember a microaggression could be nonverbal and unintentional, it is all about how someone feels about someone else. For example, if you are walking down the street and lock eyes with someone walking toward you and you smile at them and they take it has a slight. Smiling at someone on the street can be considered a violent behavior. If you take it a step farther and believe the person smiling is committing a microaggression then you are fully within your rights as a human to defend yourself, with force if necessary. I know this is an extreme example, though one simply has to look at a Black Lives Matter protest to find someone who says all white people should be killed. Go to a feminist rally or march and you’ll find people that say men need to die. Go to an LBGTQ event and you’ll find people that want to kill straight cis-gendered people. You can also go to a KKK meeting and find people who want non-whites killed. The difference is that the media, politicians, and universities, condemn the KKK (as they should) but celebrate these other groups and make excuses for their behavior. This is why you need to beware protesters, they get a free pass for their actions, one you can bet you’ll never get if you act against them.

One Story Two Perspectives

Brook’s Point of View

I was in the other room getting dressed for work. As I am looking through the closet I hear Charlie in the bedroom barking. I look around the corner and Charlie looks at me as I say “Charlie stop barking.” I go back to the closet and pick something out when I hear Charlie barking again. “Charlie, enough barking.” I say as I walk into the bedroom. Charlie looks at me a lays down on the bed. I go back to the other room and take the hanger out of my blouse when I hear Charlie barking again. I toss the hanger on the bed and go into the bedroom again and yell at Charlie “Stop barking, what are you barking at anyway?” Charlie just smiles at me and lays down on the bed again. I walk out into the hallway and put my blouse on and start looking for my shoes when I hear Charlie barking again, this time he is really losing it. I rush to the back room and yell at him again “Stop barking Charlie, there isn’t anything here to bark at.” Charlie wags his tail and jumps off the bed to follow me into the living room. I finish getting ready and head to work. I love my dogs, but sometimes they drive me crazy.

 

Charlie’s Point of View

I was laying on the bed in our room, enjoying a good nap when I heard something. Oh no I thought, I better let the rest of the pack know. I started to bark so everyone would know that I heard something. Mom looked at me from the other room and barked back at me. I laid back down on the bed when I heard it again. I started barking to let the pack know I heard something again. This time mom came into our room and started barking too. It is so much fun when mom joins in on the barking. I laid down and watch her and when she finished barking she left the room. That was a lot of fun I thought so I started barking again. This time mom came in and started barking loudly and when she stopped we both just looked at each other and laughed. Barking is a lot of fun, especially with my mom. This time I decided to bark a lot, get a good barking going so hopefully mom will come back and bark with me some more. Mom came running and I couldn’t help it but I started to wag my tail. She barked and I barked and we barked together, it was a lot of fun. I followed mom out and said bye to her as she left for work. I love my mom but I think I’m the better barker.

The Evil of Extreme Diversity

            The word diversity gets thrown around a lot today. Diversity makes us stronger, we need to focus on diversity, and diversity is our highest ideal are just a few phrases you’ll hear from politicians, Hollywood stars, and reporters. So what does it mean? The definition of Diversity is a range of different things or variety. On the surface it seems like a good thing, you would not want to eat the same thing every day, you want to enjoy a diversity of food. When you hear diversity today, it is usually in the context of people.

            A diversity of people can be a good thing when used correctly. When you have people from different backgrounds, with different skills and ideas than you can often come up with better more innovative solutions to problems. This kind of diversity is a benefit. Yet when you take diversity to an extreme you not only lose this benefit but you cause more harm than good. Lately the word diversity has been used as a club to bash any company, group, or organization that does not fit the vision of those on the left. They want a diversity of people, but not based on ideas, instead based on group identity.

            Basing diversity on group identity is textbook racism. Those ‘champions of diversity’ believe that any organization should reflect the population it operates in. So if the population is made up of 50% men and 50% women the organization should reflect that. Any organization that does not reflect this expectation is sexist (racist, homophobic, etc) and is oppressing those who are underrepresented. In short they want people to be put into positions not based on their ability but because of some group identity characteristic. They are saying the people of this group identity are not able to get the position through their own merit, but instead are being oppressed and need help. The same ‘champions of diversity’ will also shout down and shut down people who have different points of view. They seem to only favor diversity of gender or skin color but not the diversity of ideas.

            This racism of low expectations is being used by the left to gain votes (your life is shitty and hard not because of personal responsibility but because you are being oppressed, vote for me and I’ll make it better), attack those on the right or anyone who criticizes them (see he is racist he only has 2 out of 100 people who work for him that are black when black people make up 10% of the population) and to force people into censoring themselves (what are you a racist bigot? Don’t you want diversity?) It is not when you look exclusively at someone’s race or gender (etc) and force organizations to take people based on these criteria that you get diversity, it is when you look past what is on the surface to the ideas and experiences people have that you get true diversity.

What am I doing?

I am new to blogging. I mostly blog because I enjoy writing and feel like I have something to say. Of course I want what I write to be read but we don’t have to agree on what I write. I started my blog years ago but have just recently restarted posting to it. I hope that I can provide entertaining and thought provoking posts to people who read my blog. Eventually I hope to make money as a writer but currently I write because I enjoy it. It give me an outlet to express my thoughts and ideas in a clear and thought out way. Sometimes I stumble while speaking publicly but, with most everything, I will get better the more I practice. I also want to get better at writing. I think my writing skill is better than average and I have had a paid writing gig before but I want to get better.

            One thing I know I need to work on is getting my thoughts in order before I write. Most the time for these posts I just sit down and write until I am done or I run out of time. If I want what I write to be read than I need to focus on getting my thoughts together in a clear and cohesive manner. This will make it easier to read and follow my writing and (hopefully) grant me a larger audience. At some point I hope people will share what I write with others because they enjoy it and think their friends will too.

            I am open to suggestions on topics to write about but currently my favorite topics include politics, creative writing, and satire. I really enjoy writing that makes me laugh as I write it. As more and more people read what I write I hope they give me feedback on what they like and don’t like. This does not mean I will change my opinions to fit whatever other people want me to write, it just means that I will try to write more of those types of posts.

            I currently have a fantasy story in the works I’m calling Wizards and Warriors and plan to release it per chapter/ section. I am not going to give anything away but it should be a very interesting story. I will also be working on my writing skills through free writes and whatever practice/class I can find online. I will still be writing political stuff as it comes up but we all need a break from that from time to time. Feel free to let me know what you think, share my writing and leave comments.

 

Thanks,

Cody Benson

My Reply to Senator Merkley Regarding Neil Gorsuch

“Even before President Donald Trump nominated Neil Gorsuch to serve on the Supreme Court in January, I knew that I would oppose his appointment.” Meaning it did not really matter who he picked I was going to oppose him because it is Donald Trump. Having already made up your mind, you set about to oppose whoever was picked, not because you truly believe they were a bad pick for the Supreme Court, but because you hate Republican’s and President Trump so much. You then go on to say “[A]s every day goes by, it becomes clearer and clearer that a very dark shadow hangs over this President and this administration.” You just state that as if it were fact without any evidence. You try to back it up by saying he is under investigation for “potential collusion with Russia to influence and undermine our election.” It is true that the FBI is looking into it but they have not found anything yet, nor have they concluded the investigation. I remember that people in the United States are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law by a jury of their peers.

            You then go on to say Gorsuch views are out of the “judicial mainstream.” What is that supposed to mean? It seems to mean that he does not want to use the judicial system to push a mainstream agenda. Most people see that as a good thing. He is also an originalist (someone who believes that the Constitution and the law should be interpreted as perceived at the time of enactment) and a textualist (someone who things laws should be interpreted literally, not however he feels like they should be interpreted).

            You poison the well by saying things like “infamous Hobby Lobby decision” “Embraced the disturbing philosophy”. These are meant to give boring legal decisions a scary overtone. Hobby Lobby was about a company’s freedom to provide or not provide specific contraception’s. Hobby Lobby did not want “prevent women from accessing contraception through their insurance plans.” Instead they did not believe, from a religious perspective, in certain kinds of contraception’s. It is this kind of over simplification that you use to make mountains out of mole hills. You go on to call other decisions of his “both offensive and far outside the mainstream.” While I can see both sides to these cases and a choice one way or the other would be a hard one to make, just because you think he made the wrong choice does not make him the evil terrible person you claim him to be. He has said and shown time and again that he will follow the law as written.

            You end your hit piece by saying “the Founders made clear that our government was for “We the People.”” That is just flat out wrong. Our government is not for We the People, our government is We the People, a very important distinction that you seem to forget. Gorsuch is not for big corporations or special interests, he is for the original interpretation of the Constitution in the context of the time it was written and the literal textual meaning of the law, not what he personally believes is right or wrong or if he is on the right or wrong side of history. You are right in saying our We the People government is at stake, but not from Neil Gorsuch, but from lying ideologues who believe they and their party know better than We the People and seek to force their perceived vision of the anointed onto us dirty unwashed masses. You know people like you.

The original piece by Senator Jeff Merkley

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/58e2c2fee4b09deecf0e193f

Breaking News: Trump Reveals Russian Connection and Fascism with One Order

          Since his election, rumors have been circulated among the media, intellectuals on college campus, and Hollywood elites, also known as people with the right ideas. They make connections from the Trump campaign and Russia and how they conspired to rig the election so Putin could put his man in the white house. It is as clear as day for anyone to see the connection, but the alt-right and the Nazi’s all want proof of this. They should just believe what they are told, because it is for the good of the world to do so. Also if they don’t we are going to punch them.

            Included in these truths that cannot be questioned is the fact that Trump wants to be a dictator in a very fascist way. NoFact news even has evidence to prove all of this is true. The proof will shock you and could have been missed if not for the dedication to truth and integrity of our hardworking, honest, upstanding reporters. They are great reporters and work tirelessly to bring you the truth on all things about Cheeto-and-Chief, President Twitter himself. No biased reporting or fluff pieces, just hard facts and truth. We are truthful and the Fuhrer Toupee is a lying, hate spewing, racist, sexist, homophobe, Islamaphobe, Xenophobe, Transphobe, who steals candy from babies and punches grandma’s at nursing homes, while driving a Hummer that only gets 2 miles per gallon of whale oil, which he gets from all the whales he kills.

            The proof of all this was revealed last night, while at a restaurant in the DC area, one of our reporters spotted Neo-Hitler Trump as he sat down to eat dinner. The reporter got close enough to hear what was being said and recorded the whole thing. Words like Caesar and Russian were thrown around a lot by the Not My President as he was talking with a man in a white shirt and black tie. When confronted later the man insisted he was just a waiter, but with a name like Peter, it was quite clear he is a Russian operative. The most shocking of all things was when this Russian operative brought out a plate full of lettuce, croutons, Parmesan cheese, lemon juice, olive oil, egg, Worcestershire sauce, garlic, and black pepper. Some sort of secret communication no doubt between Putin and President Tiny Hands. Then the operative asked a question, which the reply was “Russian”. The operative, understanding the code word handed Fuhrer Cheeto-Tiny Hands a small bottle of pink thick liquid. He poured it all over the plate, a clearly secret answer to the operative who walked away.

            NoFact Fact checkers have been hard at work decoding this exchange. So far Caesar seems to mean, I will be Fuhrer and Russian means Putin. The fact that he poured the liquid over the plate means that his dream of being Fuhrer of America is mixed together with Putin. A clear and obvious sign of collusion between Putin and He Who Shall Not Be My President to put President Toupee in as Fuhrer of America to work for Putin. Anyone who can see anything else is just an ignorant uneducated idiot who should never be listened too because they are just in a cult dedicated to Lord Cheeto himself. With this evidence, the President should stop destroying the country and step down as president and Bernie Sanders should be put into the office, because he is the most honest, caring, trustworthy person ever (and he is socialist and everyone knows socialism is the best government ever).