Thursday, April 2, 2020

Corona Time




Corona Virus is the only topic on people’s mind right now. My wife, who just had a baby and is stuck at home, has to ask people who call her to talk about something else because she just cannot stand having the same conversation over and over again.

Luckily for me not much has changed. I am thankful my workplace is still open (for now) and that I am able to work. I can still take my dogs for walks or go play fetch with them and I can still go to the grocery store.

To be honest my life has not changed a whole lot outside of not being able to take my wife to dinner occasionally. As I make my way through this pandemic I have noticed a few things.

Muh Rights

First issue I’d like to address is the people complaining that the government has no authority to make them stay in their home. To some extent I would agree with these people. But in times of crisis we can make the choice to temporarily give up parts of our liberty in order to mitigate some of the damage.

These people will say, “You should never give up any of your liberty!” To which I would say, you already give up parts of your liberty every day in order to make not only your life better but to make the lives of those in your community better. The sacrifice you are making of certain liberties in a time of crisis will go a long way in preventing damage and permanent loss of those liberties in the future.

It is this sacrifice, even a temporary one, that will be rewarded with trust within a society. Trust in a free society is the most important commodity we can possess. The more we trust our fellow citizens the less likely we will demand laws to regulate each other.

Do not squander your individual trust or the trust of your country in a misguided understanding of freedom and liberty.

The Blame Game

This is starting to creep into the conversation and will likely ramp up as this crisis continues. This crisis is not the fault of Donald Trump or the Deep State or Democrats or Republicans. With the rare exception no one really understood the magnitude of Coronavirus. We are in the middle of this crisis and still do not fully understand it.
 
This could not have been prevented with nationalized healthcare. This is obviously clear if you look at how counties like Italy (who have nationalized healthcare) are handling this pandemic. Have things been handled poorly, of course, the people handling them are human after all and hindsight is 20/20.

It is easy to blame someone else for the problems in the world. Doing so safely moves the responsibility for dealing with them (or creating the problem in the first place) off your shoulders and onto someone else.

If there is blame to be placed it should be placed on the government of China. They have lied about this virus since the beginning, suppressed information, and allowed it to spread once they became aware of how bad it could be.

It did not help that the World Health Organization (WHO), or as they have become known now the Chinese Health Organization, bought and spread those lies. We also did not help because we wanted to believe them because we did not want to face the reality of how bad things could get.

For right now we must put those criticisms off as they fall outside the time horizon in which we are dealing with. Right now the bulk of our focus should be around two things. Producing medical supplies to help deal with people who have contracted the virus and finding a way to end the lock down to get everyone back to work.

Never Let a Crisis Go to Waste


One thing we need to watch out for is opportunistic people who are attempting to exploit fear and uncertainty to do things that under normal circumstances would not be done. I am not talking about the guy who bought all the toilet paper at Costco and is now trying to sell it on ebay for a profit (though if you are that guy, knock it off, what you are doing is still wrong).

I am talking about our representatives pushing through legislative items that have zero to do with solving the problem the legislation is trying to help with. About using the cover of crisis and media malfeasance to funnel money to pet projects or unrelated functions.

We do not need an increase in airplane fuel emission standards as part of our Coronavirus relief bill. We do not need to nationalize industries. Industry simply needs to be asked and they will step up. The number of companies shifting production from consumer goods to medical supplies increases daily.

If you think they could do it faster and better if they had to report to a bureaucrat before they made each choice then you seriously do not understand how business works. These companies are stepping up because they love this country and know it is in their best interest to do so. These business owners who are constantly vilified as greedy capitalist villains are the ones producing the sorely needed masks and gowns and ventilators that the government (over 3 different administrations) did not replenish.

At the end of the day we will get through this. The quarantine will be lifted, the virus will be defeated, and we can all move on. Yes we will have lots of work to do to repair the damage done by essentially halting the world economy, but in times like these patriotic Americans roll up their sleeves, clean up the mess, and press on.

It is tough and will get tougher but we have the strength, the courage and the determination to make it through this. We just have to take it one day at a time, help where we can, and avoid giving into the demons of our fouler nature. Each of us can make a difference in how this crisis turns out, we should try to do our best to mitigate as much suffering as possible.

Monday, March 30, 2020

Blog and Life Update



It has been awhile since I have posted or updated my blog so I thought an update was in order.

I have had a lot going on in my life in the last couple of month and because of that I have neglected my blog more than usual. I was trying to post one post a month and about a year ago I was actually pretty successful at doing so.

The more I worked on the blog the better it got and the better I became as a blogger. Yet I started to get burned out. I mostly focused on writing about political topics, both national and local. At some point the political stuff just became boring.

It was the same old fighting and bickering, within and amongst parties, and I found myself thinking that there was something better I could be doing. I am not saying that politics is unimportant, only that I was less and less interested in it.

I had also started a YouTube channel where we did a weekly show talking about politics and news stories. I really enjoyed this and really loved working with and interacting with some really cool people who I would call friends today.

We gave the YouTube channel a go and did not grow very much. We understood it was a saturated market but we wanted to try. When we realized that the future of the YouTube channel was not bright and that we all did not have time to devote to it that believed we should have we decided to call it quits.

While that was going on my beautiful wife and I decided that we wanted to have a baby. It was not a choice we made lightly but one we reached whole-heartedly with as much clarity as you can have on such a choice.

February 8th 2020 my daughter was born. Adjusting to a new sleep schedule and life with a third human in the house has been a challenge, but a very rewarding challenge. Needless to say it has left little time to blog between making dinner, working, walking dogs, and giving my wife the much needed break she deserves after a long day doing all that by herself.

And now Corona Virus. Thankfully I am still at work, my workplace has been deemed essential, and am able to earn a paycheck to support my family, for now. I am also thankful that my wife and I are relatively young and in good health. I am still able to get to the grocery store and to head out into the world and acquire essential items (formula for baby, medications for pets, etc).

While I have been on Facebook and social media recently, it is nowhere near the level that I used to be. I am thankful for this as it has allowed me to keep a level head about this pandemic and not to worry too much. Yes I am being cautious, I want to keep those I love safe and healthy, but I also understand that living life as a prisoner in our own homes and of our own fear is no life at all.

These stay at home measures are fine in a time of great crisis but they can never become a regular facet of American life. No, I don’t want people to die, but am I ready to give up my chance to live a life of freedom and liberty in order to buy a notion of security?

Between working, a new baby, and an unprecedented amount of hand washing I have found little time for blogging, or much of anything else. I am happy to report my baby is healthy, has shown a gift for smiling recently, and has already out grown her newborn clothes. As far as the blog goes, I will try to make more of an effort to update the blog on topics that I hope you and I both find interesting.

Hope you are all staying healthy and know that no matter how bad things might seem now, we will get through this and we will bounce back.

Cody Benson

Thursday, January 23, 2020

Impeachment 2020




The impeachment seems insincere, pointless, and most of all boring. The evidence for this is largely in the disinterest in the impeachment itself on behalf of the average American. Ultimately nothing will get done other than a production of a few media soundbites, and a few politicians will create more of a name for themselves.

Insincere

The impeachment seems insincere largely due to the fact that several members of the Democratic Party said and ran on the fact that they wanted to impeach Trump. We heard from them Democrats that this is a somber and sober moment and that they took no joy in moving forward with articles of impeachment.

They want to make it seem like this was a decision they came to reluctantly only after long hours of research, investigation, and contemplation. When in reality they already decided they would impeach, they only needed to wait for a reason. When a good reason never provided itself, they decided to manufacture one.

When that did not work they manufactured another, than another. The punishment had been decided, they just needed a crime.

Pointless

The outcome was already known. The Democrats knew it, the Republicans knew it, and even my dogs knew it. The House would impeach and the Senate would not remove President Donald Trump from office.

Unless something extraordinary happens nothing will change that. Was the point to attempt to appease a loud radical minority within the Democratic Party? Was the point to try and smear President Trump ahead of the 2020 election?

If it was to appease the loud radical minority than it was the wrong move to make. If you actually win, they will claim victory, if you lose they will blame you and become louder and stronger than before.

Boring
 
I am someone who enjoys politics. I like listening to political discussions, talk radio, political podcasts, and talking with friends about news and politics. Yet I find this whole impeachment saga incredibly boring.

When it comes on the radio I’ll give it a listen, but after about 5 minutes I will switch over to country music. I am not the only one who feels this way either. Rarely will anything about the impeachment come up on my social media accounts.

The podcasts I listen to will talk about it in passing but will not spend a lot of time going over the details. Even the ratings for the TV coverage of the impeachment are not impressive. It would seem that the American people do not really care about this show.

They have seen it before, they know how it is going to end, and they have more important things to do with their time.

Impeachment is a serious process, but it has been cheapened to political theater. If anything was damaged during this process it is the gravity to which the impeachment process will be viewed going forward.

Wednesday, January 15, 2020

What happened to consent of the governed?


I am thankful that throughout my life my interaction with the administrative state has been confined to the routine. Obtaining a driver’s license, filing taxes, and filing my marriage license.

Recently I have had a friend get caught up in the administrative state. I won’t go into details but essentially it boils down to an administrator acting as judge and jury for the rules and regulations their administration created and executing those decisions.

These decisions impacted my friend’s personal life on a level to which the government was never meant to interfere. This administrative agency combines the powers of the judiciary, the legislature, and an executive, yet remains un-elected and largely unaccountable to the people.

Consent of the Governed
 
In the American system of government the consent of the governed is obtained through voting for representatives. These representatives are imbued with a part of the power of each individual person through an election.

These representatives, imbued with this power, create laws and administer various functions of the government. If the people believe their representative is doing a bad job, lacks sufficient character, or they generally do not like the person they are free to select a new representative when their term is up.

These representatives must repeatedly return to the people to renew this consent to represent them. This means that representatives are accountable to the people they represent and only have power in so far as it has been granted to them by the consent of the people.

The Loss of Consent

The administrative state does not operate with the consent of the governed. Instead they claim their authority from expertise. This allows administrators to remain insulated from the ‘dirty business’ of politics. This insulation from the consent of the governed was not produced by accident, but rather a key feature of the Progressive system of politics and administration.
 
The Progressives believed that if they could empower experts and remove them from having to deal with running for elections, then those experts would be able to make the right decisions and could use the power of the government to solve the problems of their time.

In order to achieve this, Progressives needed to reject the ideas of the Founders. Chiefly the ideas of the consent of the governed and the separation of powers. By ‘freeing’ experts from politics to focus on administration, they dispensed with the consent of the governed.

Unification of Powers

The Progressives believed that the separation of powers was both inefficient and irresponsible. They thought it was inefficient because it would take a long time to get anything done. They considered it irresponsible because it made it difficult for popular will to be translated into government action.

The solution was to combine the powers of government (legislative, judicial, and executive) into administrations headed up by experts (rational educated progressive people) who could use the power of government filtered through their expertise to solve the problems of a modern world.

We see this today in the various administrative agencies, who can make rules and regulations that have the power of laws, often are able to act as judges for disputes that arise due to those rules and regulations, and can take action to enforce rules and regulations or impose punishments on those who violate them.

At the same time the Progressives did away with the separation of powers, they focused on increasing democratization of politics. This was to amplify the power of public opinion (majority faction) in politics.

The paradox of this Progressive model of politics and administration is that while it increases the volume of public opinion in politics, it removes the power of that opinion from almost any influence it would have on administration.

Meaning the power of the administrative state is separated from the consent of the governed. Yes we get to vote for President and for Congress and for Governors but we do not get to vote for the head of the EPA. The people we vote for do not debate each other and create laws, the EPA simply produces them out of thin air.

We can voice our opinions louder and we have some impact on the administrative state but if the expert in charge of an administrative agency decides to ignore the will of the people, there is very little to almost zero recourse for the people. They do not require our consent to exercise all the powers of government, instead they claim their authority from their expertise.

Human Nature

This near worship of expertise denies something the founders understood clearly. That no matter how much of an expert any individual was, in the end they are still a human being. A human with all the same flaws, faults, interests, emotions, and capacity for good and evil as any other person.

This is why the separation of powers and the consent of the governed are so important. The consent of the governed allows the people to invest their power into another human being. They can take into account the nature of the person and decide if they are the right person to entrust with their representation. 

The separation of powers is important because it helps protect the rights of the individual (the greatest minority) and provides a tempering for the passions of the people as well as a restraint on the power of those who are entrusted with governing.

In order to have a representative government, meaning a government by the consent of the people, you must have a limited government. If the government is larger than the people than it is no longer representative of the people but represents those in government. It is not merely the size of the government that poses a problem but also the manner and structure of that government.

Our government by the consent of the governed is slipping away and instead of working to restore that limited form of government we have been more interested in fighting over who controls an ever increasingly powerful administrative state. Now is the time to make the choice, do we want the liberty to pick up the responsibility to solve the problems of our times ourselves or do we want to entrust our life, liberty and happiness into the hands of administrative experts?


Thursday, December 12, 2019

The Intent behind the Question





I have seen this happen with greater frequency, particularly among Facebook groups. Someone will post an image, a screen shot, or a screen grab of a conversation. They will than make a comment and follow it up with a question.

More Than ‘Just a Question’

The question is not asked in good faith or with the aim to seek the true answer, but to provoke a specific response and feeling. Typically the response and feeling desired is anger and/or outrage. The purpose to provoke this response and feeling is polarization, which is a fancy way of saying division.

This is not to say the original poster rationally thought this out and made a choice to cause division, they probably do not even know this is what they are doing. In fact they are probably just as upset about what they are sharing as those who see it.

The truth is we all have things we do without thinking about it. We do not think about why we are doing it, what doing it will do for us now, and what sort of impact it will have in the future not only for ourselves but for those who we are connected.

The devious nature of these posts goes deeper. It hides its malicious nature behind a defense of, ‘I’m just asking a question.’ This allows the original poster an easy option out when confronted. This is the path of least resistance and feeds off our natural human nature to avoid pain and discomfort.

By avoiding this pain and discomfort we deny ourselves of an opportunity grow. We shut out having to go through the discomfort of being mindful of what we are doing and in doing so avoid the pain associated with being wrong.

Asking questions is generally a good thing as long as they are asked properly. By properly I do not mean questions people approve of, but questions seeking truth and understanding. Questions asked in good faith not questions asked seeking a specific answer or to provoke an emotion.

Responding

When you see this type of devious question being asked naturally you may get defensive and possibly angry. This is perfectly natural and simply means you are human. It is your body saying something is off about this.

If you recognize there is an agenda behind the question the impulse to pull away or to call out the asker is strong. These questions are a form of manipulation and no one enjoys being manipulated. Pulling away will only leave the person asking the question in an echo chamber and positively reinforce this form of manipulation.

Calling out the asker will only further entrench things creating more division. So how do you respond? You answer the question honestly and ask follow up questions seeking clarification. Remember the person asking the manipulative question probably does not know that they are trying to manipulate people.

More likely than not they felt an emotion and reacted without mindfulness. You responding in the same way will only make the matter worse. Be generous with your forgiveness because sometimes we all act not knowing what we do.

This is the best way to respond because sometimes you might be wrong. Responding by answering honestly and asking follow up questions leaves room for the fact that you might be misinterpreting the question. In my experience by doing this you will exchange sowing seeds of division for sowing seeds of respect.

It is by reaping this crop of respect that we can produce the more valuable product of unity.

Monday, August 26, 2019

The Portland Narrative of The Right Wing Rally

There was a Right Wing rally in Portland on August 17th 2019. The rally was to raise awareness for domestic terrorism, particularly to highlight the actions of the group known as Antifa. This rally was in response to the brutal attack, at the hands of Antifa, on an independent journalist Andy Ngo that left him with a brain hemorrhage.

Narrative One

Leading up to this rally there was a lot of hot rhetoric on both sides. This of course caught national attention and the media was attempting to bill this event as the next Charlottesville. Naturally this alarmed the public, no one wants Neo-Nazi’s and White Nationalists gathering in their city.

This narrative was pushed by the mayor, Ted Wheeler, and the mainstream media. The only problem was that the Right Wing groups were not Neo-Nazi’s or White Nationalists. In fact Enrique Tarrio, one of the organizers and head of the Proud Boys is not white at all. Seems a bit odd that a White Nationalist group is led by a non-white person.

The media and the Progressive mayor, not interested in allowing the truth to get in the way of a useful narrative, ignored that fact. The mayor instead doubled down. He made the rounds on major media outlets saying that violence will not be tolerated in Portland.

His statements were a bit vague and any attempt by media personalities to get him to clarify who he was talking about were dodged. He seemed to imply that he did not want groups from outside of Portland to bring violence into the city. It seemed like mayor Wheeler was going to allow the police to do their jobs to keep the peace.

The mayor, along with a group of Portland organizations, held a rally a few days before saying they don’t want outsiders to bring violence into their city. That they don’t want people to come here and say hateful things and spread their hateful message.

In an unrelated and totally coincidental matter, several members of Patriot Prayer had arrest warrants issued for them and were taken into custody. This included the head of Patriot Prayer Joey Gibson, who turned himself in voluntarily to the police.

The Death of Narrative One

The rally was set to start at 11am on Saturday August 17th 2019. Several groups showed up early to organize people and to share their location on social media. I arrived 15 minutes early and made my way to park where the rally was set to take place. After making my way around the police line and ending up among the black bloc I eventually made my way to the Right Wing group.

The Right Wing groups met up in the park, surrounded by police and screaming protesters. The protesters shouted at the Right Wing groups, called them Nazi’s, fascists, racists, and yelled at them to go home. While the organizers were from out of town a lot of people at the rally lived in or near Portland.

The Proud Boys got between the protesters and other members of the rally, trying to keep everyone focused on the speakers rather than engaging in shouting matches. Most the people at the rally understood that Antifa were a distraction and focused on the speakers. While in the park the Right Wing groups knelt down and said a prayer.

They prayed for Antifa and the city of Portland. To bring light into the city and to bring an end to the hate. This was followed by a signing of the national anthem and chants of USA. After this the organizers announced they would march to another location. They walked across the bridge and ended up at their location. It was here that a man walked into the group and started shouting F*** YOU while pointing at the face of every person he saw.

The Proud Boys acted quickly to keep the crowd away from him and the police quickly removed the man from the situation. No punches were thrown, no one was beat up and the police did their job. Soon after this, around 1:30pm the group was told by the organizers to disperse and head home. People left and made their way home.

The rally was over and it was peaceful. Antifa remained and turned their anger on individuals they singled out as Nazi’s, the police, and even attacked the bus the Proud Boys were attempting to leave on. Seems a bit odd that Antifa members spent hours yelling at the Right Wing groups to leave and the moment they try to leave they attack them.

After the Right Wing groups left a civil disturbance was declared due to illegal blocking of roads and several assaults committed by Antifa. The next day the media tried to carry the narrative forward writing things like ‘violence rocks Portland at Far Right rally’ or ‘13 arrested at Far-Right protest in Portland.’

They seem to have forgot that almost everyone has a cell phone with a camera and can watch the events happen in real time, unedited. These media companies had their comment sections light up as people pointed out that they are attempting to mislead people. Mayor Wheeler came out afterward and said that Joe Biggs, one of the organizers, was no longer welcome in Portland.

Wheeler said that Bigg’s message of hate had no place in the city of Portland. This narrative died as soon as the bus carrying the Right Wing rally goers left the city.

Narrative Two (Plan B)

We the people are not stupid. We understand that Antifa is a huge problem in Portland, but Mayor Wheeler refuses to directly address them and the media refuse to shine the light on this group. The first narrative was false and that falsehood was exposed for the world to see, and public sentiment started to turn against Wheeler and Antifa.

That is when the second narrative was born. In order to shift public sentiment against the peaceful Right Wing groups the media started running stories about how much businesses who closed their shops the day of the rally suffered.

The estimated cost to these businesses was $3 million and expected to grow. The media of course is trying to stand this narrative on the corpse of the previous one. They say if these Right Wing groups would not provoke people than things like this would never happen.

To clarify, the narrative goes like this. If Right Wing groups would stop committing the crime of being Right Wing in Portland than black clad people would not have to violently assault people, destroy property, and attack the police costing millions of dollars of tax payer money and hurting business.

It would seem that the Mayor does not believe the people actually committing the acts of violence and property destruction are responsible for their actions. Instead it is the groups who those people hate. It also seems that Mayor Wheeler believes the Right Wing groups are responsible for the hate and anger of other people because the Right Wing groups are the objects of that hate.

The Mayor of Portland seems to think that Right Wing groups should not be allowed to go into certain places if they are hated in those places. And if they do go into those places they are not allowed to enter, the simple act of being there is justification for the outrage, anger, hate and physical attacks they suffer. Not only that but that they are to blame for the attacks they suffer and any damage done due to those attacks.

The goal of this second narrative seems to be the same as the first, sway public opinion against the Right Wing groups.

A Comparison

Joey Gibson, leader of Patriot Prayer told reporters that he and his group have done around 60 rallies all over the state of Washington. All have been peaceful, no property damage was done, and no one was hurt. A few counter protesters even showed up but they all remained civil and everyone got to exercise their right to free speech peacefully.
 
Antifa protested in Portland after the election of President Donald Trump and cost the city $1 million in damages. There was no Patriot Prayer in the city, the Proud Boys did not exist as a group, and no one was counter protesting them. They were so upset about the election of Donald Trump they attempted to burn down and destroy the very communities they now claim they are protecting.

The question becomes, if Patriot Prayer can have around 60 peaceful rallies (so peaceful they get zero media coverage) all over the west coast, why is it that there is only fighting and violence in Portland? You must also ask, if Antifa protests turn toward violence and destruction even in the absences of Right Wing groups, why does the mayor not address directly the issue of Antifa violence?

The problem at these rallies are not the Right Wing groups (don’t get me wrong the Right Wing groups have problems of their own to be sure, just like any other group), they understand they are under a microscope at these events. They understand that any hint of aggression, any fighting, or any statement will be analyzed, picked apart, twisted and turned if it can be used to support the narrative that the cause of all the problems are Right Wing groups.

The problem is not even Antifa, but rather the culture of Portland itself. A ‘Progressive’ culture that increasingly focuses on a person’s group identity as an indicator of good or bad. A culture that believe the world is a conflict between good and evil people. A culture that believes if words make you upset that is violence, to be met with physical violence justified as self-defense. A culture that applies laws differently depending on your ideological belief and the fact that you wear a mask.

Wednesday, July 3, 2019

The Attack on Andy Ngo and Portland's Rule of Mob



Last weekend we saw the first major event of the protest season in Portland Oregon. Antifa showed up in force and marched down the streets hand in hand with violence and hated.

Double speak chants issued from the black clad crowd. “No Hate, No Fear, Proud Boys are not welcome here.” Were these chants to protest hatred and fear or were they an attempt to purge this feeling from their own hearts?

Andy Ngo

Andy Ngo is a Portland based independent journalist who has worked extensively covering the protests in Portland Oregon. He documents what happens and shares the video on social media as well as writes articles for publications such as Quillette and the Wall Street Journal.

Saturday he was covering several of the events in downtown Portland, excited about his new GoPro camera. Sadly that excitement was short lived when a large group of Antifa protesters, dressed in all black and in masks to obscure their identities, descended on him.

It started with someone pointing him out specifically and telling the crowd he was a ‘bad person.’ This singling out was all that was needed to provide the incentive for the mob to unleash their fury.

First it was someone throwing a drink, probably a milkshake, on Andy. This action was met with cheers and applause. Bolstered by this reaction other members of the crowd quickly stepped up to escalate the violence.

Andy, with his hands up covering himself, was struck several times. Fists, gloves with hardened knuckles, and silly string repeatedly struck Andy. The chaos emboldened Antifa members took the opportunity to rob Andy, stealing his new GoPro and the camera he had been using to document the protest.

Attempting to escape this hate, Andy stumbled across the park, unaware of the extent of his injuries. He felt dizzy and sat down, unknowing that the cause of this feeling was due to a bleed in the brain caused by the attack.

The police, having been ordered to stand down in the face of Antifa by Mayor Ted Wheeler, arrived at Andy’s location and offered medical aid. Andy eventually made it to a hospital later that night to discover the seriousness of his injuries.

Other Attacks

Another man alone, filming Antifa marching the wrong way down the middle of a one way street was pepper sprayed by Antifa and chased off.

An elderly man was confronted by Antifa only to be left with blood running down his face as the violent mob beat him, kicked him while he was down and threw objects at him. When another man tried to intervene to break up the fight he was struck over the head from behind with what appeared to be a crowbar.

This man later went to the hospital and received over 20 stitches in his head. These attacks were just the ones that got reported.

Rule of Mob

The Portland Police is taking a lot of heat for these violent protests. People wonder why they can be seen watching nearby as black clad Antifa violently assault people and destroy property. This is not due to the laziness of the individual officers, or the lack of a desire to perform their duty.

Instead this is due to orders they have been given. These orders come directly from the police commissioner, Mayor Ted Wheeler. Mayor Wheeler justifies these orders by saying he is bound by the first amendment to allow people to protest.

While people have the right to free speech and freedom of assembly, this right must be exercised peacefully. Mayor Wheeler, with the help of some members of the media, tries to pin all the violence on Conservative and Right Wing groups.

If you dig a little and observe other events these groups hold outside of the city of Portland (across the river in Vancouver for example) they are peaceful, people are allowed to speak and counter protesters are allowed to protest. As soon as Antifa shows up things get violent.

The media love to weasel headline these stories. A weasel headline is when you state something that is not false (which is different than something that is true) and frame it in the opposite direction. For example ‘Violence breaks out at Patriot Prayer rally.’ Makes it seem like violence follows the group Patriot Prayer and their rallies.

When you watch the video of the rally you can clearly see it is Antifa attacking the group they do not like. Mayor Wheeler, instead of condemning this sort of behavior actually applauds it. He thanked Antifa for their harassment of ICE personnel saying that he is glad that they are bringing national attention to this problem.

Mayor Wheeler also says that if the police enforce the law it will just cause more protests and Antifa riots. Instead of upholding the rule of law and protecting the liberty of the citizens, we now see a violent aggressive group being allowed to assault who they want, disrupt and direct traffic, and damage property.

When the police do make an arrest these people are often let out on bail or given a fine and turned lose. The city of Portland used to be a beautiful city, full of weird and interesting people peacefully pursuing their American dream. Now it has turned into a graffiti covered homeless camp soaked in urine and littered with used needles.

Where angry black clad mobs rule the street, imposing their ‘woke’ justice through violence and intimidation, backed by city council members and the mayor. Where the police force, whenever they are allowed to enforce the law, are thrown under the bus for political gain. Where business owners keep boards the size of their windows in their stock rooms ready for the destruction of the next round of violence.

The line between civilization and anarchy has worn thin in Portland. Responsibility and authority have been abdicated and the group filling that vacuum believe they are justified in violently enforcing their beliefs on the citizens. With the 2020 elections on the horizon I can only see this downward spiral getting worse. For the citizens of Portland I hope that I am wrong.